Raiffeisen Scandal – Revelation of 02.09.2025

Introduction – The Veil Lifts

This publication tears away the veil of secrecy over a system long out of control: banks, law firms, the judiciary and politics – bound together in an impenetrable swamp of abuse of power and corruption. A system that is active today, that bends the law, mocks the rule of law and shields itself through mutual protection.

In recent months, thousands of emails and new documents have reached us. The picture is shocking: numerous injured parties – private individuals as well as entrepreneurs – report the same structures of abuse of power.

Imprint / Identity: We are journalists and lawyers who work voluntarily, unpaid and financially independent. For security and source-protection reasons, we deliberately keep personal details in the imprint brief and instead provide a central, reliable point of contact (including for whistleblowers). We answer serious enquiries; abusive or fictitious contacts cannot be enabled.

Access: Enquiries from unknown email addresses or fantasy names cannot be enabled for security reasons. This serves to protect all parties involved.

Important: For all persons named, the presumption of innocence applies. Allegations and proceedings are decided exclusively by the competent courts. The content is extremely sensitive; accordingly, we proceed with particular legal caution and do not intend to cause harm to anyone.

The Revealing Case Study

In insolvency proceedings, the creditors were offered an offer of 100% satisfaction of all claims to avert the insolvency – without any loss to the bank and the remaining creditors. Nevertheless, the judge and the applicant refused. Who was behind this?

Lawyer: Mr Dr. Gregor Schett (Fellner law firm)
Bank: Raiffeisenbank Mostviertel, represented by the managing directors Mr Hannes Scheuchelbauer and Mr Ing. Kurt Moser

The outcome: The bank received not a single cent even one and a half years after the opening of insolvency – instead there were further losses.

Even more incredible: in an avoidance action in the same insolvency matter – in which Raiffeisenbank Mostviertel, represented by the managing directors Mr Hannes Scheuchelbauer and Mr Ing. Kurt Moser as well as Mr Dr. Markus Fellner and Mr Dr. Gregor Schett, had previously rejected the full settlement of all claims – the same bank later paid several hundred thousand euros, without a judgment, behind closed doors, simply to avoid a trial.

This is not a mishap, not an isolated case. It is systematic abuse of the law. Equally scandalous: the Financial Market Authority and the Raiffeisenbank Lower Austria audit association watch – and remain silent.

Key Revelations

1) Closed Network

A dense web of banks, politics, judiciary and professional bodies.
Those who should control, protect. Those who should examine, cover up.
The system keeps itself alive – at the expense of the rule of law and citizens.

2) Legal Upheavals – Law Firm Fellner & Partner

Mr Dr. Gregor Schett at the centre of the gravest allegations.
The exclusion of Mr Dr. Gregor Schett by Mr Dr. Markus Fellner was not a cleansing, but an attempt at damage control.
After the Raiffeisen-Scandal website became public, Mr Dr. Gregor Schett was removed from the firm with effect as of 30 June 2025; subsequently, he renounced his licence to practise law.
Risks of liability are high; credibility has been shaken.

3) Commercial Court Vienna – Judicial Entanglements

Decisions repeatedly benefit specific economic networks.
Indications of Masonic/brotherhood ties are mounting.
A blow to judicial independence.

4) “Wienerzocker” – Platform

www.wienerzocker.com as a tool to influence opinion and markets.
Operated by Dr Angela Steger, daughter of the former FPÖ Secretary‑General, and her husband Dr Christoph Erler.
Spreading false reports, defamation and targeted character assassination to influence proceedings and markets.

5) Mr Günther Kerbler – Real Estate Network & Wiener Privatbank SE

Mr Günther Kerbler, majority owner of Wiener Privatbank SE.
Sales of properties at inflated purchase prices to related business partners → subsequent insolvencies → cheap buy‑back.
Courts, supervision, insolvency administration: looking away or playing along.

6) Supervisory Dimension – FMA vs. Raiffeisenbank Mostviertel

The Financial Market Authority investigates – far too late.
In focus: the managing directors Mr Hannes Scheuchelbauer and Mr Ing. Kurt Moser.
Increasingly alarming: customers’ properties are being taken without their knowledge and in violation of basic legal norms, in particular through the abuse of powers of attorney – with the involvement of the Fellner law firm and a major Vienna notary’s office. This constitutes a classic self‑dealing transaction. This creates an urgent suspicion of fraudulent conduct that must be examined by the competent authorities.

Addition: It should also be noted that the Austrian Chamber of Notaries, apparently aware of the situation, has, despite seven statements of facts, so far taken no action in the matter.

7) Mr Klemens Hallmann – The Billionaire in Restructuring Proceedings

The billionaire is unable to pay his tax debts. To free himself, he filed for restructuring at the very last second – to the detriment of taxpayers.
Appointed as insolvency administrator: Mr Dr. Stephan Riel (according to our information, Klemens Hallmann has been no stranger to him at least since 2008).
The documents were transmitted to us, legally examined and subsequently released.
In focus: Mr Dr. Markus Fellner – UniCredit as the largest creditor of the Hallmann Group.

The Explosive Nature of the Revelations

The web stretches from Mr René Benko via Mr Michael Tojner to political leaders. It reveals a system of power, influence and isolation that undermines the rule of law.

The transactions among one another – Mr Günther Kerbler, Mr Michael Tojner, Mr Klemens Hallmann, Mr Lukas Neugebauer, Mr Nemat Farrokhnia and Mr René Benko – show how deeply business and politics are intertwined.

Part of the objects from the Burgenland housing cooperatives (various proceedings in connection with Mr Michael Tojner) ended up with Mr Günther Kerbler.

Another, now almost forgotten point: the BAWAG property sales in the so‑called best‑bid procedure. Through targeted price agreements, the properties ultimately went to René Benko and Günther Kerbler – then chairman of Conwert SE.

The documentation also shows how the Jelitzka Group, Winegg and 3S Immobilien are being artificially stabilised by banks to prevent a wave of insolvencies and a real market collapse.

Conclusion

These are not old stories. This system operates today. The actors are known, the structures documented. Transparency tears away their protection in the dark – and forces them into the light.

Note: For all persons named, the presumption of innocence applies. Allegations and proceedings are decided exclusively by the competent courts.